Blocking destructive disk-wipe commands on raw devices
NousResearch/hermes-agent · cluster 102371 · agent
Data as of
4 open items. Fix attempted, not merged.
The short answer
1open issue
3open PRs
5items grouped
- Known?
- Yes. 5 related items grouped here, 0 issues already closed.
- Fix event
- No fix has been merged to main. 1 PR closed without merging; see the attempts below.
- Tracker
- The maintainers' tracker marks this
unresolved. That is separate from the fix event. - Still open
- 1 issue and 3 PRs.
Next step: read the attempts below. Your case may extend or revive that work.
Pick up a Lab taskThese issues and PRs concern a gap in safety coverage for commands like shred, wipefs, and blkdiscard when run against raw block devices, and proposed fixes to add approval or hardline restrictions for such operations.
Open issues1
- Issue#102371[Bug]: shred/wipefs/blkdiscard on block devices have zero hardline/dangerous coverage (silent disk destruction)
Open PRs3
1 PR closed without merging
From the close comments: duplicate 1
-
#102377 fix(approval): block shred wipefs blkdiscard on raw block devices · duplicate →
#102376,#102371
How this cluster was grouped
-
Link evidence (
structural links throughout): every member is connected by structural evidence: shared changed files, or a closing/superseded reference. -
Pairwise link density
0.40: the share of item pairs that carry a link, counting a structural link in full and a relevance-only link at 0.36.1.00means every pair is linked.
Pick up a Lab task
Check whether a fix covers the open issues here, with your own agent. Bring back evidence for maintainers.
Open the LabAt a glance
- Subsystem
- agent
- Closed issues
- 0
- Attempts
- 1 PR closed without merging