Discord docs corrections and voice slash UI fixes
NousResearch/hermes-agent · cluster 11349 · docs
Data as of
Nothing open on GitHub. Fix merged in #20411. Check it covers your case.
The short answer
- Known?
- Yes. 5 related items grouped here, 1 issue already closed.
- Fix event
- A fix was merged to main in PR #20411. Check it covers your case. No release data is tracked.
- Tracker
- The maintainers' tracker marks this
unresolved. That is separate from the fix event. - Still open
- Nothing open on GitHub.
A cluster of issues and pull requests addressing multiple documentation inaccuracies in Discord integration, including Echo Prevention mechanics, Server Members Intent behavior, SSRC mapping, and a missing /voice join option in the slash command UI.
Open issues0
Open PRs0
Fixes on record
-
#20411 docs(discord): fix Server Members Intent + SSRC-mapping drift + /voice join slash Choice (salvage #11350)
files:
gateway/platforms/discord.py,website/docs/user-guide/features/voice-mode.mdShow the diff
-
gateway/platforms/discord.py@@ -2654,9 +2654,14 @@ async def slash_reload_skills(interaction: discord.Interaction): await self._run_simple_slash(interaction, "/reload-skills") @tree.command(name="voice", description="Toggle voice reply mode") - @discord.app_commands.describe(mode="Voice mode: on, off, tts, channel, leave, or status") + @discord.app_commands.describe(mode="Voice mode: join, channel, leave, on, tts, off, or status") @discord.app_commands.choices(mode=[ - discord.app_commands.Choice(name="channel — join your voice channel", value="channel"), + # `join` and `channel` both route to _handle_voice_channel_join in + # gateway/run.py — expose both in the slash UI so autocomplete + # matches what the docs advertise and what the runner accepts when + # the command is typed as plain text. + discord.app_commands.Choice(name="join — join your voice channel", value="join"), + discord.app_commands.Choice(name="channel — join your voice channel (alias)", value="channel"), discord.app_commands.Choice(name="leave — leave voice channel", value="leave"), discord.app_commands.Choice(name="on — voice reply to voice messages", value="on"), discord.app_commands.Choice(name="tts — voice reply to all messages", value="tts"), -
website/docs/user-guide/features/voice-mode.md@@ -281,10 +281,10 @@ In the [Developer Portal](https://discord.com/developers/applications) → your | Intent | Purpose | |--------|---------| | **Presence Intent** | Detect user online/offline status | -| **Server Members Intent** | Map voice SSRC identifiers to Discord user IDs | +| **Server Members Intent** | Resolve usernames in `DISCORD_ALLOWED_USERS` to numeric IDs (conditional) | | **Message Content Intent** | Read text message content in channels | -All three are required for full voice channel functionality. **Server Members Intent** is especially critical — without it, the bot cannot identify who is speaking in the voice channel. +**Message Content Intent** is required. **Server Members Intent** is only needed if your `DISCORD_ALLOWED_USERS` list uses usernames — if you use numeric user IDs, you can leave it OFF. Voice-channel SSRC → user_id mapping comes from Discord's SPEAKING opcode on the voice websocket and does **not** require the Server Members Intent. #### 3. Opus Codec
-
3 PRs closed without merging
From the close comments: done elsewhere 1 · superseded by another PR 1 · other 1
-
#11350 docs(discord): correct six documentation drifts + add /voice join slash choice · other →
#11416,#11349 -
#11416 fix(discord): align voice docs and slash UI · superseded by another PR →
#11350,#20411 -
#78164 docs(discord): correct Echo Prevention mechanics + Server Members Intent conditional + close env-var docs class (resolves #11349) · done elsewhere →
1cf156e
Closed issues · 1
- Closed#11349docs(discord): six documentation drifts vs actual behavior + `/voice join` missing from slash UI
How this cluster was grouped
-
Link evidence (
structural links throughout): every member is connected by structural evidence: shared changed files, or a closing/superseded reference. -
Pairwise link density
0.40: the share of item pairs that carry a link, counting a structural link in full and a relevance-only link at 0.36.1.00means every pair is linked.
Pick up a Lab task
Check whether a fix covers the open issues here, with your own agent. Bring back evidence for maintainers.
Open the LabAt a glance
- Subsystem
- docs
- Merged PRs
- #20411
- Closed issues
- 1
- Attempts
- 3 PRs closed without merging
- Fix link checked
- 5 May 2026