Nothing open on GitHub. Fix merged in #117568 on 20 Sep 2026. Check it covers your case.
The short answer
0open issues
0open PRs
3items grouped
- Known?
- Yes. 3 related items grouped here, 1 issue already closed.
- Fix event
- A fix was merged to main in PR #117568. Check it covers your case. No release data is tracked.
- Tracker
- The maintainers' tracker marks this
resolved, deciding PR #117568. That is separate from the fix event. - Still open
- Nothing open on GitHub.
The local runtime GGUF planner did not recognize tensor type 39 (MXFP4), causing gpt-oss GGUF models to be skipped or unlisted. These items address adding support for that tensor type so affected models are handled correctly.
Open issues0
Open PRs0
Fixes on record
-
#117568 fix(local-runtime): gpt-oss MXFP4 GGUFs get a preset instead of 'unknown ggml tensor type 39' (#116681, salvage #116699)
files:
hermes_cli/local_runtime/gguf.py,tests/hermes_cli/test_local_runtime_gguf.py
1 PR closed without merging
From the close comments: merged via another change 1
-
#116699 fix(local-runtime): admit gpt-oss GGUFs to managed model listings · merged via another change →
e56c229,#117568
Closed issues · 1
- Closed#116681Local runtime: GGUF planner does not know the MXFP4 tensor type (39), so every gpt-oss GGUF is skipped
How this cluster was grouped
-
Link evidence (
structural links throughout): every member is connected by structural evidence: shared changed files, or a closing/superseded reference. -
Pairwise link density
0.67: the share of item pairs that carry a link, counting a structural link in full and a relevance-only link at 0.36.1.00means every pair is linked.
Pick up a Lab task
Check whether a fix covers the open issues here, with your own agent. Bring back evidence for maintainers.
Open the LabAt a glance
- Merged PRs
- #117568
- Closed issues
- 1
- Attempts
- 1 PR closed without merging
- Fix link checked
- 20 Sep 2026