NousResearch/hermes-agent
excluded_providers not applied to user-defined provider entries
Cluster 142961 · hermes cli. Data as of
2 open items. Fix attempted, not merged.
The short answer
1open issue
1open PR
3items grouped
- Known?
- Yes. 3 related items grouped here, 0 issues already closed.
- Fix event
- No fix has been merged to main. 1 PR closed without merging; see the attempts below.
- Tracker
- The maintainers' tracker marks this
unresolved. That is separate from the fix event. - Still open
- 1 issue and 1 PR.
Next step: read the attempts below. Your case may extend or revive that work.
Pick up a Lab taskThe members describe one theme: the model_catalog.excluded_providers setting reportedly does not hide user-defined providers, which appear as custom:<name>. Two members are fixes titled around honouring excluded_providers for user-defined providers in the model picker or model rows; their outcomes are not stated here.
Open issues1
- Issue#142961model_catalog.excluded_providers does not hide user-defined providers: entries (they surface as custom:<name>)
Open PRs1
- PR#142990fix(model-picker): honour excluded_providers for user-defined providers
1 PR closed without merging
From the close comments: duplicate 1
-
#142977 fix(model): honour excluded_providers for user-defined provider rows · duplicate →
#142990
How this cluster was grouped
-
Link evidence (
structural links throughout): every member is connected by structural evidence: shared changed files, or a closing/superseded reference. -
Pairwise link density
0.67: the share of item pairs that carry a link, counting a structural link in full and a relevance-only link at 0.36.1.00means every pair is linked.
Pick up a Lab task
Check whether a fix covers the open issues here, with your own agent. Bring back evidence for maintainers.
Open the LabAt a glance
- Subsystem
- hermes cli
- Closed issues
- 0
- Attempts
- 1 PR closed without merging