Send Hermes User-Agent to RouterMint to avoid Cloudflare 1010
Cluster 14439. Data as of
Nothing open on GitHub. Fix merged in #15048 on 24 Apr 2026. Check it covers your case.
The short answer
- Known?
- Yes. 3 related items grouped here, 1 issue already closed.
- Fix event
- A fix was merged to main in PR #15048. Check it covers your case. No release data is tracked.
- Tracker
- The maintainers' tracker marks this
resolved, deciding PR #15048. That is separate from the fix event. - Still open
- Nothing open on GitHub.
The three members concern RouterMint requests from Hermes lacking a User-Agent header, which an issue links to Cloudflare 1010 errors. Two pull requests propose sending a Hermes User-Agent, one of them also covering model probes and one described as a salvage of #14440.
Open issues0
Open PRs0
Fixes on record
-
#15048 fix(providers): send Hermes User-Agent to RouterMint (salvage #14440)
files:
hermes_cli/doctor.py,hermes_cli/models.py,run_agent.py,scripts/release.py,tests/run_agent/test_provider_attribution_headers.py
1 PR closed without merging
From the close comments: merged via another change 1
-
#14440 fix: send Hermes user agent to RouterMint and model probes · merged via another change →
#15048
Closed issues · 1
- Closed#14439RouterMint custom-provider requests can fail with Cloudflare 1010 when Hermes omits User-Agent
How this cluster was grouped
-
Link evidence (
structural links throughout): every member is connected by structural evidence: shared changed files, or a closing/superseded reference. -
Pairwise link density
0.67: the share of item pairs that carry a link, counting a structural link in full and a relevance-only link at 0.36.1.00means every pair is linked.
Pick up a Lab task
Check whether a fix covers the open issues here, with your own agent. Bring back evidence for maintainers.
Open the LabAt a glance
- Merged PRs
- #15048
- Closed issues
- 1
- Attempts
- 1 PR closed without merging
- Fix link checked
- 24 Apr 2026. This confirmation is old and may be out of date (a revert or reopen would not have invalidated it here); re-verify.