Memory recall accuracy and authority labeling concerns
Cluster 17164. Data as of
Nothing open on GitHub. Fix merged in #28583 on 19 May 2026. Check it covers your case.
The short answer
- Known?
- Yes. 3 related items grouped here, 1 issue already closed.
- Fix event
- A fix was merged to main in PR #28583. Check it covers your case. No release data is tracked.
- Tracker
- The maintainers' tracker marks this
resolved, deciding PR #28583. That is separate from the fix event. - Still open
- Nothing open on GitHub.
These items address concerns that recalled memory may be treated as authoritative rather than informational, potentially leading to false project status reports or unverified file mutations. The work involves labeling recalled memory appropriately to reflect its uncertain nature.
Open issues0
Open PRs0
Fixes on record
-
#28583 fix(memory): label recalled memory as informational, not authoritative (#28001)
files:
tests/tools/test_file_operations.py
1 PR closed without merging
From the close comments: merged via another change 1
-
#28001 fix(memory): label recalled memory as informational, not authoritativ… · merged via another change →
0b89628,#28583
Closed issues · 1
- Closed#17164Critical: memory/session recall can report false project status and mutate files without verified baseline
How this cluster was grouped
-
Link evidence (
structural links throughout): every member is connected by structural evidence: shared changed files, or a closing/superseded reference. -
Pairwise link density
0.67: the share of item pairs that carry a link, counting a structural link in full and a relevance-only link at 0.36.1.00means every pair is linked.
Pick up a Lab task
Check whether a fix covers the open issues here, with your own agent. Bring back evidence for maintainers.
Open the LabAt a glance
- Merged PRs
- #28583
- Closed issues
- 1
- Attempts
- 1 PR closed without merging
- Fix link checked
- 19 May 2026