# NousResearch/hermes-agent · CODEOWNERS file for workflow review protection

## Open now

- 3 issues, 1 PR open on GitHub.
- #23632: \[SECURITY\] No CODEOWNERS file — workflow files lack mandatory review protection
- #31935: \[SECURITY\] Missing CODEOWNERS — no mandatory review protection on workflow files
- #34765: Suggestion: Add CODEOWNERS file for automatic review routing
- PR #23751: fix(repo): protect workflow paths with codeowners

These issues and PRs concern the absence of a CODEOWNERS file, specifically to enforce mandatory review requirements on workflow files. Members include security reports flagging the gap and proposed fixes adding CODEOWNERS coverage.

## TL;DR

- 5 member(s): 3 open issue(s), 0 closed issue(s), 1 open PR(s), 0 merged PR(s), 1 PR(s) closed without merging.
- No fix has been merged to main; one or more PRs were attempted (see below).
- **Recommended:** review the prior/competing PR(s) below. A fix was attempted but not merged; your case may extend or revive that work.

## Maintainer resolution verdict

- Internal-tracker verdict over this cluster's issue members: `unresolved`. This is distinct from the fix status above. Weigh it yourself.

## How this cluster was grouped

- Link evidence (`STRUCTURAL_PARTIAL`): some members are connected by structural evidence (shared changed files, or a closing/superseded reference); the rest are joined by an automated relevance judgement over their text.
- Members outside that structural core may belong to a different underlying problem.
- Pairwise link density `0.41`: the share of member pairs that carry a link, counting a structural link in full and a relevance-only link at 0.36. `1.00` means every pair is linked.

## Open related issues

- #23632: \[SECURITY\] No CODEOWNERS file — workflow files lack mandatory review protection
- #31935: \[SECURITY\] Missing CODEOWNERS — no mandatory review protection on workflow files
- #34765: Suggestion: Add CODEOWNERS file for automatic review routing

## Prior & competing PRs

- **#23751: fix(repo): protect workflow paths with codeowners**. open
  - maintainer direction: category `uncategorized`; implication `needs_llm`; refs `#23632`, `#31935`, `#31935`
  - files: `.github/CODEOWNERS`, `tests/test_codeowners.py`
- **#83690: fix(repo): protect workflow paths with codeowners**. closed without merge
  - maintainer direction: category `merged_via`; implication `superseded`; refs `a90d5369f76`, `96ddaf9b8b0`, `#23751`

## Fix status

- No merged fix on record.
- Subsystem: `contributors`