Memory system proposals: scoring, forgetting, recall, and guidance
NousResearch/hermes-agent · cluster 346 · agent
Data as of
11 open items. Fix attempted, not merged.
The short answer
11open issues
0open PRs
15items grouped
- Known?
- Yes. 15 related items grouped here, 2 issues already closed.
- Fix event
- No fix has been merged to main. 2 PRs closed without merging; see the attempts below.
- Tracker
- The maintainers' tracker marks this
unresolved. That is separate from the fix event. - Still open
- 11 issues and 0 PRs. Broad area: open items may be separate problems.
Next step: read the attempts below. Your case may extend or revive that work.
Pick up a Lab taskMost members concern an agent's memory: what to store or forget, importance scoring, timestamps and decay, eviction, structured or cognitive recall, and memory guidance wording. A few edge items (feedback routing, multilingual extraction) are adjacent rather than clearly the same problem.
Open issues11
- Issue#509Feature: Cognitive Memory Operations — LLM-Driven Encoding, Consolidation, Adaptive Recall & Extraction (inspired by CrewAI)
- Issue#678Feature: Memory Extraction (Atomic Facts from Text) + Forgetting (Decay, Pruning, Targeted Purge)
- Issue#3506Feature: Durable Feedback Routing — More Consistent Use of Memory, Skills, and Follow-Up Planning
- Issue#9135[Feature]: Improving Multilingual Memory Extraction in Hermes
- Issue#12883[Memory System] No importance-scoring mechanism — what should be remembered vs. forgotten?
- Issue#15471[Feature]: Memory usage frequency tracking for smarter eviction
- Issue#46713Feature: User correction pipeline — structured behavioral feedback that persists across sessions
- Issue#54246MEMORY_GUIDANCE lacks a judgment test for what belongs in memory vs. what's just important
- Issue#54247MEMORY_GUIDANCE: add routine-turn judgment test
- Issue#61424feat(memory): add timestamps to memory entries for freshness tracking and auto-expiry
- Issue#66654Bug: Memory pollution & stale memory accumulation — missing timestamps, priority, and data-cleaning mechanism
Open PRs0
2 PRs closed without merging
From the close comments: other 2
Closed issues · 2
How this cluster was grouped
-
Link evidence (
partly structural links): some members are connected by structural evidence (shared changed files, or a closing/superseded reference); the rest are joined by an automated relevance judgement over their text. - Members outside that structural core may belong to a different underlying problem.
-
Pairwise link density
0.07: the share of item pairs that carry a link, counting a structural link in full and a relevance-only link at 0.36.1.00means every pair is linked.
Pick up a Lab task
Check whether a fix covers the open issues here, with your own agent. Bring back evidence for maintainers.
Open the LabAt a glance
- Subsystem
- agent
- Closed issues
- 2
- Attempts
- 2 PRs closed without merging