NousResearch/hermes-agent

flush_memories timeout config and removal discussion

Cluster 6154. Data as of

Nothing open on GitHub. Fix merged in #6361 on 9 Apr 2026. Check it covers your case.

The short answer

0open issues
0open PRs
3items grouped
Known?
Yes. 3 related items grouped here, 1 issue already closed.
Fix event
A fix was merged to main in PR #6361. Check it covers your case. No release data is tracked.
Tracker
The maintainers' tracker marks this resolved, deciding PR #6361. That is separate from the fix event.
Still open
Nothing open on GitHub.

These items concern a bug where flush_memories() uses a hardcoded 30-second timeout instead of the configured value, along with proposed fixes and a refactor to remove the function entirely.

Open issues0

No open issues.

Open PRs0

No open pull requests.

Fixes on record

Merged to main. A stamp counts the issues a fix is linked to.

  • #6361 fix(agent): respect config timeout for flush_memories instead of hardcoded 30s

    merged to main

    files: run_agent.py, tests/run_agent/test_flush_memories_codex.py

1 PR closed without merging

From the close comments: merged via another change 1

  • #6177 fix(agent): respect config timeout for flush_memories · merged via another change → #6361
Closed issues · 1
  • Closed#6154[Bug]: flush_memories() hardcodes 30s timeout, ignores config value
How this cluster was grouped
  • Link evidence (structural links throughout): every member is connected by structural evidence: shared changed files, or a closing/superseded reference.
  • Pairwise link density 0.67: the share of item pairs that carry a link, counting a structural link in full and a relevance-only link at 0.36. 1.00 means every pair is linked.

Pick up a Lab task

Check whether a fix covers the open issues here, with your own agent. Bring back evidence for maintainers.

Open the Lab

At a glance

Merged PRs
#6361
Closed issues
1
Attempts
1 PR closed without merging
Fix link checked
9 Apr 2026. This confirmation is old and may be out of date (a revert or reopen would not have invalidated it here); re-verify.

For your agent

The same facts, typed.