NousResearch/hermes-agent

Skills index rebuild failures and catalog gaps

Cluster 66616 · cron. Data as of

1 open item. Fix merged in #109178 on 12 Sep 2026. Check it covers your case.

The short answer

1open issue
0open PRs
4items grouped
Known?
Yes. 4 related items grouped here, 1 issue already closed.
Fix event
A fix was merged to main in PR #109178. Check it covers your case. No release data is tracked.
Tracker
The maintainers' tracker marks this partially resolved, deciding PR #109178. That is separate from the fix event.
Still open
1 issue and 0 PRs.

A cluster of issues and fixes around the skills index failing to rebuild due to ClawHub catalog ingestion falling below expected thresholds, plus related efforts to surface all catalog sources on the skills hub page.

Open issues1

  • Issue#66787Skills index stuck since 2026-07-16: ClawHub crawl (~15k) below EXPECTED_FLOORS (20k) fails every rebuild

Open PRs0

No open pull requests.

Fixes on record

Merged to main. A stamp counts the issues a fix is linked to.

  • #109178 Skills index builds again after 54 days frozen; K-Dense + OpenScience science skills tapped (salvage #60559)

    merged to main

    files: .github/workflows/skills-index.yml, scripts/build_skills_index.py, tests/scripts/test_build_skills_index_health.py, tests/tools/test_skills_hub.py, tests/tools/test_skills_hub_clawhub.py, tools/skills_hub_clawhub.py, tools/skills_hub_github.py, website/docs/user-guide/features/skills.md

1 PR closed without merging

From the close comments: other 1

  • #101061 fix(ci): self-heal stale skills index watchdog · other → #66616
Closed issues · 1
  • Closed#66616[skills-index-watchdog] Skills index is stale or degraded (degraded)
How this cluster was grouped
  • Link evidence (partly structural links): some members are connected by structural evidence (shared changed files, or a closing/superseded reference); the rest are joined by an automated relevance judgement over their text.
  • Members outside that structural core may belong to a different underlying problem.
  • Pairwise link density 0.39: the share of item pairs that carry a link, counting a structural link in full and a relevance-only link at 0.36. 1.00 means every pair is linked.

Pick up a Lab task

Check whether a fix covers the open issues here, with your own agent. Bring back evidence for maintainers.

Open the Lab

At a glance

Subsystem
cron
Merged PRs
#109178
Closed issues
1
Attempts
1 PR closed without merging
Fix link checked
12 Sep 2026

For your agent

The same facts, typed.