Custom provider target_model ignored on resolve path
Cluster 93092. Data as of
Nothing open on GitHub. Fix merged in #93356 on 24 Aug 2026. Check it covers your case.
The short answer
- Known?
- Yes. 3 related items grouped here, 1 issue already closed.
- Fix event
- A fix was merged to main in PR #93356. Check it covers your case. No release data is tracked.
- Tracker
- The maintainers' tracker marks this
resolved, deciding PR #93356. That is separate from the fix event. - Still open
- Nothing open on GitHub.
These items concern a bug where target_model is silently ignored when resolving a named custom provider that has a default model, along with a broader fix batch covering several unrelated single-site issues. The custom-provider target_model resolution problem is the dominant shared theme.
Open issues0
Open PRs0
Fixes on record
-
#93356 fix: five independent single-site fixes — target_model on custom providers, STT error surfacing, stale cron next_run_at, browser-use PATH floor, draft-sweep age gate (#93092, #93045, #93049, #93115, #93055)
files:
apps/desktop/src/plugins/hermes-bots/plugin.js,apps/desktop/src/plugins/hermes-bots/tests/hide-bot-chats.test.mjs,contributors/emails/[redacted:email],contributors/emails/[redacted:email],cron/jobs.py,hermes_cli/runtime_provider.py,tests/cron/test_due_stale_cron_edit.py,tests/hermes_cli/test_runtime_provider_resolution.py,tests/tools/test_browser_use_cli.py,tests/tools/test_transcription_tools.py,tools/browser_use_cli.py,tools/transcription_tools.py
1 PR closed without merging
From the close comments: merged via another change 1
-
#93094 fix(providers): honor target_model on the custom-provider resolve path · merged via another change →
#78573,#93356
Closed issues · 1
- Closed#93092[Bug]: resolve_runtime_provider ignores target_model when requested provider is a named custom provider with a default model — auxiliary.<task>.model silently falls back to the provider default
How this cluster was grouped
-
Link evidence (
structural links throughout): every member is connected by structural evidence: shared changed files, or a closing/superseded reference. -
Pairwise link density
0.67: the share of item pairs that carry a link, counting a structural link in full and a relevance-only link at 0.36.1.00means every pair is linked.
Pick up a Lab task
Check whether a fix covers the open issues here, with your own agent. Bring back evidence for maintainers.
Open the LabAt a glance
- Merged PRs
- #93356
- Closed issues
- 1
- Attempts
- 1 PR closed without merging
- Fix link checked
- 24 Aug 2026