CODEOWNERS file for workflow review protection
NousResearch/hermes-agent · cluster 23632 · contributors
Data as of
4 open items. Fix attempted, not merged.
The short answer
3open issues
1open PR
5items grouped
- Known?
- Yes. 5 related items grouped here, 0 issues already closed.
- Fix event
- No fix has been merged to main. 1 PR closed without merging; see the attempts below.
- Tracker
- The maintainers' tracker marks this
unresolved. That is separate from the fix event. - Still open
- 3 issues and 1 PR.
Next step: read the attempts below. Your case may extend or revive that work.
Pick up a Lab taskThese issues and PRs concern the absence of a CODEOWNERS file, specifically to enforce mandatory review requirements on workflow files. Members include security reports flagging the gap and proposed fixes adding CODEOWNERS coverage.
Open issues3
Open PRs1
- PR#23751fix(repo): protect workflow paths with codeowners
1 PR closed without merging
From the close comments: merged via another change 1
-
#83690 fix(repo): protect workflow paths with codeowners · merged via another change →
a90d536,96ddaf9,#23751
How this cluster was grouped
-
Link evidence (
partly structural links): some members are connected by structural evidence (shared changed files, or a closing/superseded reference); the rest are joined by an automated relevance judgement over their text. - Members outside that structural core may belong to a different underlying problem.
-
Pairwise link density
0.41: the share of item pairs that carry a link, counting a structural link in full and a relevance-only link at 0.36.1.00means every pair is linked.
Pick up a Lab task
Check whether a fix covers the open issues here, with your own agent. Bring back evidence for maintainers.
Open the LabAt a glance
- Subsystem
- contributors
- Closed issues
- 0
- Attempts
- 1 PR closed without merging